Here's what Jeff found:
- Productivity doubled in less than six months reducing total project costs by 50%.- Defects were reduced by 40% in all Scrum projects (despite the fact this company already had one of the lowest defect rates in the world.)- Planning costs were reduced by about 80%.- User satisfaction and developer satisfaction were much higher than comparable waterfall implementations.- Projects were linearly scalable, something never seen before. The productivity of individual developers remains the same as the project increases in size.
Extracted From - http://www.richard-banks.org/2007/09/agile-vs-cmmi-comparison.html
No comments:
Post a Comment